Paylocity is one of the leading HRIS & Payroll providers in the mid-market today, but some Paylocity users will find themselves looking for alternatives that can provide a different value prop. Here are some alternatives to consider:
Paylocity is one of the leading platforms in the HRIS market today, but not every company is a perfect fit for what they offer.
When users of Paylocity are looking to move to a new system, it is often because there are specific outcomes that they desire and might be able to find more easily with a different provider.
Looking for hard-to-find HRIS pricing data? Get precise estimates with our app.
Below is a list of the main Paylocity alternatives and what alternative strengths they can provide
These three companies share quite a few similarities with Paylocity. They are all large, public companies with a long history in the payroll industry. They all have tens of thousands of customers and thousands of employees. Additionally, they all serve the mid-market and can provide an all-in-one solution from hire-to-retire.
ADP rarely needs an introduction. Their flagship HRIS is Workforce Now, which is geared towards the 50-1,000 employee segment. Workforce Now builds off of ADP's strong payroll heritage and can provide a scalable, all-in-one offering for any industry covering all needs from recruiting and onboarding to performance, comp and succession. One big differentiator for ADP is their comprehensive services, which allow companies to outsource a variety of back-office tasks from benefits enrollment and reconciliations to new state registrations and compliance management
Paycom is the company most often evaluated against Paylocity and there are some large differences in the two companies' philosophies. Paycom is a closed ecosystem and every module in their platform has been built internally which leads to a more unified system and less manual re-entry from admins. This can contrast with Paylocity's open architecture which can lead to some module-to-module clunkiness, but also an easier time integrating with 3rd parties
Paycor is the most recent company of this group to go public and has taken a growth-by-acquisition strategy. This has led Paycor to acquire a leading ATS tool in Newton and a leading performance and engagement platform in 7Geese. These tools allow Paycor to offer the most advanced talent management functionality in the mid-market, but can also lead to a less unified experience from an admin perspective.
These three solutions are all founded in the 2010s and offer users a more modern user interface and employee experience. Because these solutions are cloud-native, they are also built with open integrations at the core of their offerings. However, these systems generally can't offer all of the functionality that the previous tier can and may not be configurable enough for growing companies
Namely grew like a rocket ship in the mid 2010s but ran into some challenges as they added more customers and tried to scale up-market. Over the last few years, they've settled in as the most complete and mature HRIS offering in the modern segment. Namely leverages leading 3rd parties for their timekeeping and recruiting, which makes the all-in offering stronger, albeit less unified. Additionally, Namely can provide outsourced benefits and payroll services that only ADP can match. Namely was acquired by PrismHR in 2022.
Rippling is the newest name in this group and the fastest growing too. Rippling has brought to market a few things that no one else can match at this point, including their no-code automation capabilities, their integration marketplace and their IT management tools which allow for device and app management from your HRIS. Rippling's functionality is still developing and they cannot offer performance, engagement or a robust timekeeping system at this time.
BambooHR has been one of the darlings of the HRIS industry for the last decade. They provide cost-effective, user friendly software that drastically simplifies HR management for companies in nearly every industry. Bamboo's product offers a wide degree of breadth including recruiting, performance management and employee engagement, but some of their modules are limited in how configurable they are. Additionally, Bamboo's payroll is provided by a 3rd party which they own, called Trax, and doesn't have a benefits admin module.
These two companies are less well-known in the mid-market but each one has a full suite HRIS platform and a growing customer base. Although these companies don't have the R&D budgets of the ADP's and Paylocity's of the world, they still provide very solid technology solutions that emphasize different strengths. However, the real difference with these companies is the service model, which is much more handheld, personalized and responsive than working with the large, public providers.
PrimePay is a support–driven organization that can offer a support model with fewer layers and more personalization. PrimePay acquired SyncHR’s HRIS platform in 2021 and can offer a modern architecture that is flexible and open to integrations. SyncHR's technology is especially dynamic around org charts, reporting and budgeting. The platform covers the entire lifecycle, but some of the system is provided by 3rd parties, rather than being fully built internally.
Proliant has a few verticals that they are particularly well suited for, and they have some differentiated features that can make hiring and paying hourly employees easier on businesses. Proliant clients experience a higher level of service than they would tend to get from one of the large, national competitors, and that service extends to tax support which Proliant is strong in. The user experience with Proliant isn't as seamless as it is with more modern or more unified competitors
These two companies are similar to the Paylocity's of the world in that they can provide all-in-one HRIS functionality to cover the hire-to-retire lifecycle. However, these companies are much more scalable than the mid-market options, which means the system can configure to your team's needs and workflows more easily. The flip side of this scalability is that these systems can take more effort to administer and can be more costly.
UKG is one of the most well-known companies in the HRIS industry and provides an all-in-one system that caters to every member of the HR department. UKG can provide strong Core HR management, leveraging Kronos's timekeeping tools, while also providing leading talent management tools that make recruiting, performance reviews and employee engagement easier to administer. UKG can be one of the more premium priced options in the market, however.
Ceridian offers very advanced and unified Core HR tools that allow companies with complex workforce management needs to easily track time and pay employees. Ceridian has one of the most unified product architectures which can lead to more accuracy and more speed when it comes to calculating pay, making employee changes and creating reports. The system can take longer than any on this list to implement, however.
Paylocity is a leading provider of HRIS and payroll solutions for mid-sized companies. However, some companies may seek alternatives if they have specific needs or desired outcomes that Paylocity does not fully address.
Some of the main alternatives to Paylocity include ADP (Workforce Now), Paycom, Paycor, Namely, Rippling, BambooHR, PrimePay, Proliant, UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group), and Ceridian. These alternatives offer a range of HRIS solutions tailored to the needs of mid-sized organizations.
Each alternative offers unique strengths and functionalities. For example, Paycom provides a closed ecosystem with internally built modules for a more unified system, while Namely offers a modern user interface and leverages third-party integrations. Understanding these differences can help organizations choose the right alternative for their specific needs.
Yes, these alternatives are specifically designed to cater to the needs of mid-sized companies. While some providers may offer solutions for larger enterprises as well, they typically offer features and pricing structures tailored to mid-sized organizations.
Mid-sized companies should consider factors such as the comprehensiveness of the HRIS solution, scalability, ease of use, integration capabilities, customer support, and pricing. Evaluating these factors can help organizations make an informed decision based on their unique requirements.